Compliance & Policy
EPA Plans Rollback of Oil and Gas Emissions Rules
EPA plans to roll back federal emissions regulations covering oil and gas operators, according to NOTUS. The agency has not yet filed a Federal Register notice identifying which provisions are under review.

Waypoints
EPA plans to roll back federal emissions regulations covering oil and gas operators, per a NOTUS report
Existing oil and gas NSPS cover methane, VOCs and hazardous air pollutants from new, modified and existing operations
Colorado, New Mexico and California maintain stricter state-level methane rules including Regulation 7, the NM methane waste rule, and SB 1137
The Inflation Reduction Act methane fee starts at $900 per metric ton in 2024 and rises to $1,500 per metric ton in 2026, enforced through the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
A notice of proposed rulemaking or direct final rule in the Federal Register would open a 60- to 90-day public comment window
What Operators Need to Watch
The Environmental Protection Agency plans to roll back federal emissions regulations covering oil and gas operators, according to a NOTUS report. The agency has not yet filed a Federal Register notice identifying which specific provisions are under review, leaving producers and service providers to read between the lines of the announcement.
The existing framework — the oil and gas New Source Performance Standards and the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program — covers methane, volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants from new, modified and existing upstream and midstream operations. The current standards require leak detection and repair surveys, control of associated gas, and limits on flaring and venting. EPA's own greenhouse gas inventory identifies the oil and gas sector as the largest industrial source of methane emissions in the United States.
A rollback would reopen the federal performance floor at a time when several producing states have moved ahead. Colorado's Regulation 7, New Mexico's methane waste rule, and California's Senate Bill 1137 all impose stricter monitoring and capture requirements than the federal baseline. Producers with assets across multiple jurisdictions would continue to navigate layered compliance obligations regardless of how EPA retools the standard.
The waste and recycling sector has direct exposure to the regulatory direction. Tightening federal capture and control requirements have driven volumes of contaminated drill cuttings, tank bottoms, separator sludge and produced water to third-party treatment, thermal desorption, recycling and salt-cavern disposal facilities. Operators that built capacity in the last 36 months around rising upstream compliance expectations now face a demand question tied directly to which federal provisions survive.
How the IRA Methane Fee Fits In
The rollback also intersects with the methane fee codified in the Inflation Reduction Act, which imposes a per-ton charge on reported oil and gas sector emissions above statutory thresholds. The fee starts at $900 per metric ton for 2024 and rises to $1,500 per metric ton in 2026, enforced through the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program rather than the NSPS. A performance-standard rollback would not by itself erase the charge, but it could alter the data pipeline operators rely on for exposure modeling.
Industry reaction will run along predictable lines. The American Petroleum Institute and several state oil and gas associations have pressed the agency to revisit what they describe as duplicative federal and state requirements. A coalition of state attorneys general and environmental organizations has signaled litigation if EPA moves to weaken the methane framework beyond the 2024 standard.
The Next Filing Sets the Clock
The controlling procedural milestone is the Federal Register filing. A notice of proposed rulemaking or direct final rule would set a public comment window and, depending on the agency's chosen pathway, a 60- to 90-day clock for compliance revisions. Service providers and operators with state-leveraged contracts should expect a more detailed federal proposal before any compliance obligation changes, given the statutory process requirements for revising NSPS rules.
For now, the scope of the revision is the open question — whether EPA narrows the rule to specific control technologies, exempts certain well categories, or rewrites the framework wholesale. That scope decision, not the announcement itself, will determine whether the rollback reshapes capital plans across the upstream, midstream and waste-compliance chain through 2025 and 2026.
via Google News: Environmental compliance and EPA (Source)