Compliance & Policy
EU Anti-Greenwashing Rules Take Effect, Raising the Bar for Recycling Claims
The ECGT directive is now in application, banning unverified green claims, offset-based neutrality messaging and unfounded durability claims across the EU market.

Waypoints
ECGT entered into application on Sunday, having been adopted by EU lawmakers in 2024.
Commission studies found over half of green claims in the EU vague or misleading and 40% completely unsubstantiated.
Forward-looking climate pledges now require public implementation plans with time-bound targets, allocated resources and third-party verification.
The EU's Directive on Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition (ECGT) entered into application on Sunday, giving enforcement authorities new grounds to act against companies making unverified sustainability claims about products and materials. For firms selling recycled content, recyclability or low-carbon goods into the European market, the compliance question is now concrete: what proof sits behind the label.
European lawmakers adopted the ECGT in 2024. The directive amends two existing consumer protection instruments — the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) and the Consumer Rights Directive (CRD) — to cover green transition and circular economy claims. When the European Commission first proposed the amendments, it cited studies showing that more than half of green claims made by companies in the EU were vague or misleading, and 40% were completely unsubstantiated.
The directive bans generic environmental claims such as "environmentally friendly" or "biodegradable" when not backed by proof. It also prohibits claims that a product has a neutral, reduced or positive emissions impact based on greenhouse gas offsetting schemes — a provision that cuts directly at carbon-neutral positioning built on credits rather than verified material or process changes.
Sustainability labels face new restrictions. Only labels based on official certification schemes or established by public authorities remain permissible. In practice, that squeezes the crowded field of private eco-labels that have grown up around recycled content and circular products, and shifts the burden onto certification systems to demonstrate official standing.
The durability provisions reach into product design and end-of-life behavior. The directive requires guarantee information to be more visible and mandates a harmonized label giving prominence to goods with an extended guarantee period. It bans unfounded durability claims, bans prompts to replace consumables earlier than strictly necessary, and bans presenting goods as repairable when they are not.
For circularity commitments specifically, the directive sets strict criteria for forward-looking climate pledges. Companies advertising future environmental targets must publish a detailed, realistic and publicly available implementation plan with time-bound targets and allocated resources, verified by an independent third-party expert. Corporate circularity pledges — recycled-content targets, closed-loop commitments, waste-reduction goals — now function as trackable obligations with deadlines and disclosed resource allocations, not aspirational messaging.
The ECGT sits within a broader package of EU circular economy legislation, alongside the ecodesign regulation and the proposed green claims directive. The ecodesign regulation, which allows the EU to adopt product-level environmental sustainability requirements across a wide range of categories, is active and moving through its multi-year implementation period. The green claims directive, which would go further in policing claims about the environmental attributes of products and services, was effectively paused last year over concerns about its impact on small businesses and has yet to be revisited.
That split trajectory defines the compliance horizon. The ECGT is now in application and enforceable through national consumer protection authorities under the amended UCPD framework. The green claims directive remains in political limbo, leaving pre-market substantiation rules for explicit environmental claims unresolved at the EU level.
The next milestones to track are transposition and enforcement: how member states operationalize the amended directives through national law, and how consumer authorities apply the new rules to label schemes, offset-based claims and durability marketing. Separately, the fate of the paused green claims directive — and whether the Commission revisits it — will determine whether substantiation requirements tighten further for companies making environmental claims about products and material streams in the EU market.
via ESG Today (Source)
More from Daniel Okafor
Show full bio
Correspondent covering consumer brands and retail at Circular Wire.
133 articles