E-Scrap & Battery Recycling
JHC Claims 95% Lithium Recovery as It Scales Battery Recycling
L&F subsidiary JHC says it has hit a 95% lithium recovery rate as it expands spent-battery recycling, positioning recovered metals for the parent's cathode operations.
Waypoints
JHC, subsidiary of L&F, reports a 95% lithium recovery rate
The company is expanding its spent-battery recycling business
Recovered material feeds L&F's cathode materials operations
Announced capability; commercial-scale throughput figures not yet disclosed
JHC, the battery-recycling subsidiary of Korean materials producer L&F, says it has secured a 95% lithium recovery rate as it expands its spent-battery recycling business — a figure that puts the company's process economics in the same conversation as the sector's top-tier operators.
For practitioners, the number is the story. Lithium has historically been the hardest metal to pull back out of a black mass stream at commercial yields; recovery rates in the 50–60% range were common in first-generation hydrometallurgical loops, with nickel and cobalt running well ahead. A 95% lithium claim, if it holds at scale, changes the arithmetic on what a recycler can bid for feedstock and still make margin.
What does the claim change for the supply side?
L&F is best known as a cathode materials supplier, which means JHC sits unusually close to the offtake. Rather than selling recovered salts into an open market, the parent's cathode operations give the subsidiary a built-in destination for recycled lithium, nickel and cobalt — a closed-loop position many standalone recyclers are still trying to contract their way into.
That structure matters as feedstock competition tightens. Recyclers with captive offtake can pay more for end-of-life cells and production scrap, and they're insulated from some of the commodity price swings that have squeezed merchants. JHC's expansion signals L&F intends to push that advantage harder.
How solid is the 95%?
One caveat practitioners will already be applying: the announcement doesn't yet specify whether the 95% lithium recovery is demonstrated at pilot scale, at a commercial line, or across a defined throughput. Built capacity and announced performance are different things, and this disclosure reads as an announced capability rather than a commissioned-plant milestone.
The claims that will matter next are:
- The nameplate tonnage of the expanded operation — how many tonnes of black mass or spent cells per year the 95% applies to
- Whether the recovery rate is verified by a third party or an internal mass balance
- The permitting and construction timeline for any new capacity the expansion implies
Until those land, treat 95% as a process claim with a deadline attached, not a settled operating fact.
Why the timing isn't accidental
Korea's battery materials sector has spent two years under pressure from falling cathode prices and Chinese competition in processed salts, and vertical integration into recycling is one of the few levers that cuts feedstock cost while answering the EU battery regulation's recycled-content requirements. For a cathode maker supplying European OEMs, an in-house recycling loop is becoming less of a diversification play and more of a qualification requirement.
That's the frame in which L&F is expanding JHC: the recycled-content mandates now phasing into force in export markets effectively reward the exact capability the subsidiary is claiming.
What to watch next
The claim has a natural proof point coming: either JHC discloses commercial-scale throughput and verified recovery data, or the 95% stays a brochure number. Watch for a capacity figure, a plant commissioning date, or a contracted feedstock deal — any one of those converts this from a capability announcement into a capacity story, and that's when competitors will have to price it in.
via Google News: Battery recycling and e-waste (Source)
More from Elena Vasquez
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering technology and product news in Circular economy and the environmental industry at Circular Wire.
340 articles