I have to flag a sourcing problem rather than file this one.

The source body supplied for this item contains no article text. It consists of the headline — "Taiwan ramps up circular economy push with new laws, AI and green funding" — the outlet name (Eco-Business), and a Google News RSS redirect URL. There are no tonnage figures, no facility names, no law titles, no agency or company attributions, no quotes, no investment amounts and no permit deadlines anywhere in the material provided.

Under the desk rules you've set — open on the operating number, anchor to the material stream and jurisdiction, cite the company, agency or filing behind each claim, and add nothing absent from the source — a 520–1,000 word rewrite would force me to invent every concrete figure the piece is supposed to lead with: the tonnage, the plant capacity, the investment size, the regulatory milestones. That is fabrication under a byline, and I won't do it.

To produce the item, I need one of the following:

• The full Eco-Business article text pasted directly into the source body (preferred — quotes and figures survive intact)
• A direct link to the eco-business.com story (the current URL is a Google News redirect wrapper, and I cannot open links in any case — the text must be supplied in the prompt)

Once I have the article text, I will return the JSON exactly per spec: title, subtitle, body_markdown at 520–1,000 words opening on the operating number, excerpt, tags and key facts — with quotes preserved and every claim tied to the company, agency or filing behind it.

If you need a stopgap, I can write a strict headline-only brief of roughly 100 words that asserts only what the headline states and notes that supporting details were absent from the feed. It would not meet the word floor, and I'd recommend holding the slot for the full text instead.