Circular Economy

Vietnam pins circular economy shift on industrial sector

Vietnam's industrial sector leads the circular economy push under the 2020 Environmental Protection Law, with 2025–2030 framed as the decisive window for closed-loop value chains.

Waypoints

  1. Vietnam's circular economy framework rests on the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection plus related decrees and decisions, shifting governance to full product lifecycle management.

  2. Ecosystems developed by Vingroup, Gamuda and DoGreen have deployed waste-to-energy gasification, with some operations achieving negative carbon emissions.

  3. MoIT and the Vietnam Economic Science Association identify 2025–2030 as the pivotal window, requiring three pillars: institutional framework, technology, and financial mechanisms.

Vietnam has set its industrial sector as the spearhead of a national transition from linear to circular production models, with the 2025–2030 period framed by the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MoIT) as the decisive window for the shift. The programme anchors to the country's net-zero emissions commitment for 2050 and to the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection, the statutory foundation for the whole framework.

Chu Viet Cuong, Director of the Industrial Development Support Centre under MoIT, said the circular economy policies have been formalised through the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection and a series of related decrees and decisions. The legal package, in his words, marks "a fundamental shift in governance, moving from pollution control and post-impact mitigation towards full lifecycle management of products, spanning resource extraction, production, consumption and waste treatment."

That lifecycle mandate now cuts across five policy domains: environment, finance, industry, trade and investment. Since the early 2020s, the guiding principles from the Party and State have been to align circular economy development with broader renewal of the growth model, keep enterprises at the centre while the State plays a supporting role, blend market mechanisms with regulation, and accelerate innovation and technology adoption.

Built capacity versus announced ambition

The distinction between operating projects and policy intent matters here. On the operating side, VietnamPlus reports that ecosystems developed by Vingroup, Gamuda and DoGreen have deployed waste-to-energy gasification technologies, harnessing renewable energy and, in some cases, achieving negative carbon emissions. Recent related coverage from the same outlet points to measurable progress in industrial residue streams: fly ash utilisation rose to 84% in 2021 from 37.5% in 2018, and during 2022–2023 many thermal plants consumed 100% of daily fly ash output while drawing down long-stored stockpiles.

Beyond those cases, however, the picture is thinner. VietnamPlus notes that most companies pursue green transition largely within their own operations. Fully integrated, closed-loop value chains — the core test of a functioning circular economy — remain limited.

Pham Van Quan, Deputy Director of MoIT's Industrial Agency, laid out the barriers: high upfront investment costs, shortages of skilled labour, difficulties in policy enforcement, and uncertainties in technology and partnership selection. While enterprises are central, he said, the State's role in direction, regulation and resource allocation remains critical. According to the Industrial Agency, the circular economy requires tailored policies to help firms overhaul production models, develop eco-industrial parks, deploy advanced technologies, and strengthen domestic and foreign linkages to build competitive ecosystems.

A hybrid model, three pillars

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Bui Quang Tuan, Vice President of the Vietnam Economic Science Association, called the circular economy an irreversible trend for Vietnam and identified digital technology as the core driver and gateway to global integration. He compared three reference models — the European Union's institutional framework-led approach, China's state management-driven model, and the governance-and-innovation-led approaches of Apple and IKEA — and recommended Vietnam adopt a hybrid combining all three.

For the 2025–2030 phase, Tuan said Vietnam must perfect and launch three strategic pillars: the institutional framework, technology, and financial mechanisms. Investment in a quality workforce, international cooperation in technological application, and public awareness campaigns are, in his assessment, essential complements.

The stakes for manufacturers are commercial as much as environmental. The MoIT framing positions the transition as the route for Vietnamese producers to join green supply chains, accelerate the recycling industry, and invest in new materials and advanced technologies that replace conventional inputs — competitiveness arguments aimed squarely at export-facing industry.

What to watch

The near-term milestones are legislative and financial, not rhetorical. The decrees and decisions implementing the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection define the lifecycle-management rules that industrial operators will have to meet, and the rollout of Tuan's three pillars — institutional, technological, financial — during 2025–2030 will determine whether Vietnam's closed-loop pledges convert into built recycling capacity and integrated value chains, or stay confined to in-house efficiency projects at a handful of conglomerates. The 2050 net-zero deadline is the outer boundary; the implementing regulations due in this five-year window are the ones that decide what happens next.

via mediaen.vietnamplus.vn (Original)

Share this article:

More from Daniel Okafor

Daniel Okafor

Show full bio

Correspondent covering consumer brands and retail at Circular Wire.

137 articles

Nearby routes

« Previous article